The jury failed to reach a decision on that particular charge, didn't they? (View Post)

No, the judgment https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/huda-ammori-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-3/ says that "“Concerned in terrorism” is defined at section 3(5) of the 2000 Act&quo… (View Post)

The court noted that there are laws against wielding sledgehammers etc. without resorting to the Terrorism Act 2000. (View Post)

Is it not the role of the courts to interpret what laws mean? (View Post)

No. Contrary to your prejudices, what I've seen so far has the court's decision being based on the Terrorism Act 2000. (View Post)