beentheredonethat
- 
      Re: Survation has the party that dropped 20% in C&A with a 6% lead in Batley & Spen – politicalbetting.cJH is always interesting and tries to look beyond his own biases. An increasingly rare attribute (View Post)2
- 
      Re: The widespread notion that LAB can automatically assume 2nd prefs of LDs is not supported by real liGood grief! You know what they say about stopped clocks. (View Post)2
- 
      Re: The widespread notion that LAB can automatically assume 2nd prefs of LDs is not supported by real liTell them not to invite 20000 Scots then. Seriously it must be distressing for them though. Sorry for you and them. (View Post)1
- 
      Re: The widespread notion that LAB can automatically assume 2nd prefs of LDs is not supported by real liYep but many people are otherwise unaware of those tendencies, probably most of the electorate. (View Post)2
- 
      Re: Remember that a CON-LD swing smaller than in C&A in 1990 led to Maggie going within a month – politiMe. I like to see my name in lights (View Post)2
 
    