Wulfrun_Phil
-
Re: The data the advocates of a “progressive alliance” ignore – politicalbetting.com
OT. The 2nd preferences of LD voters shown in the thread don't in my view amount to very much. They are representative of a specific situation of a year ago where: 1. The Conservatives were significa… (View Post)1 -
Re: The Tories can no longer rely on first past the post – politicalbetting.com
If we simply aggregate the votes cast in the two seats last night, the Conservatives still came out on top with 24,500+ votes, followed by the LDs and Lab. The Conservatives were the only party not t… (View Post)1 -
Re: The Tories can no longer rely on first past the post – politicalbetting.com
There wasn't any scope for a tactical vote surge in Wakefield because it was mathematically impossible for there to be one of any significance. That's because the LDs scored a puny 3.9% of the vote i… (View Post)2 -
Re: The LDs claim victory in Tiverton & Honiton – politicalbetting.com
Parliamentary by-election gains for Labour have been rare beasts. The last three have taken between them 25 years - Wirral South (1997), Corby (2012) and now Wakefield. It is a significant recovery a… (View Post)1 -
Re: The LDs claim victory in Tiverton & Honiton – politicalbetting.com
No it hasn't because that binding together in the present context would require Russia to be an EU member. And in so far that the leaders of Germany etc have been happy to bind its economy to Russian… (View Post)2