Wulfrun_Phil
-
Re: The betting continues on the by-election that might not happen – politicalbetting.com
Just for the record, while I have posted here with critical comments about the ULEZ expansion, not in principle but because of the rushed and botched way it has been handled and its irrelevance (at b… (View Post)1 -
Re: Nadine’s going to have to put up with more Tweets like this – politicalbetting.com
FPT No, the Mayor's press release doesn't state that at all. CO2 emissions were falling anyway due to a number of factors that all contributed to the 6%. Read further and you will find that the addit… (View Post)2 -
Re: Can the Tories get hope from opposition to ULEZ? – politicalbetting.com
On thread, what I do object to is Sadiq Khan's attempt to conflate ULEZ with action against climate change. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jul/28/sadiq-khan-says-climate-crisis-more-imp… (View Post)2 -
Re: The polling that should worry LAB majority punters – politicalbetting.com
The latter. Starmer would prefer the SNP to bring down a Labour minority government as they did in 1979. So he can afford to face down the SNP because that outcome would be electorally beneficial for… (View Post)2 -
Re: Losing your deposit no longer the negative it was – politicalbetting.com
But would the cheerful fluffy dog be small, or far away? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dwajb0Zgt_g (View Post)1