Wulfrun_Phil
-
Re: Why the next election might not be a 1997 redux – politicalbetting.com
It is of course right to recognise that Labour is coming from a far harder starting position than in 1997, and that the electoral geography is not in its favour. It does not follow from that that Sta… (View Post)4 -
Re: Starmer speaks for the nation – politicalbetting.com
Based on memories of your past posts I really don't have you marked down as someone even slightly supportive of Labour led by Starmer. You are welcome to reference back through your archive in order … (View Post)1 -
Re: Starmer speaks for the nation – politicalbetting.com
I agree. But Starmer's position stems from a lot more than just Corbyn's failure to accept the report condemning Labour's antisemitism under his leadership. Corbyn has by his actions made it very cle… (View Post)1 -
Re: The front pages after an eventful day – politicalbetting.com
Corbyn has by his actions made it very clear that he will defy the Labour whip on all manner of votes as he pleases should he ever again get re-elected as a Labour MP. His voting record when an MP, u… (View Post)1 -
Re: LDs very close to taking Wokingham in new constituency poll – politicalbetting.com
OT. Why is the comparison being given with 2017 and not 2019? At the 2019 GE the party shares in Wokingham were Con 49.6%, LD 37.7%, Lab 10.4%. So the change in shares is Con -8%, LD 0%, Lab +2%, Bre… (View Post)1