Wulfrun_Phil
-
Re: The Burnham surge – politicalbetting.com
Utter nonsense from Hodges. His mother must be turning in her grave at what her son has become. Even if No 10 had done diddly squat, there was inevitably implied "pressure" on the FO in tha… (View Post)6 -
Re: The Burnham surge – politicalbetting.com
On thread. Burnham and Rayner would indeed make a useful pairing to replace Starmer. But stark reality means that Burnham has to curb his ambition. There is no way for him to become an MP in time wit… (View Post)2 -
Re: Why a change of leader might not help Labour – politicalbetting.com
You've missed out some of the highest hurdles. Burnham needs to: 1. Hope that none of his rivals triggers a contest in the wake of the locals OR that Starmer wins such a contest 2. Persuade an M… (View Post)2 -
Re: Why a change of leader might not help Labour – politicalbetting.com
Note the nod-nod, wink-wink contrivance between the two parties favouring secession such that one sees an 8.8% fall in their regional vote in order that the other can boost their regional vote by 11.… (View Post)1 -
Re: Why a change of leader might not help Labour – politicalbetting.com
On thread, two observations: 1. Opinion should not be judged in its own right, but in direct comparison with Starmer. In the source YouGov article, "Do you think Keir Starmer has been a.... PM&q… (View Post)1