TimT
-
Re: Contrasting betting charts for two very different by-elections – politicalbetting.com
Don't know if this has been posted yet, but the first causal link in the blood clot complication with the AZ vaccine has been found: platelet factor 4 protein clumps to the adenovirus surface if the … (View Post)5 -
Re: It’s surely less than a 74% chance that the CON will win both? – politicalbetting.com
The evidence from social psychology is against you on that last point. Logically speaking, you'd think you'd be right. Having the discipline to learn a field and apply critical thinking skills should… (View Post)4 -
Re: It’s surely less than a 74% chance that the CON will win both? – politicalbetting.com
I would be pretty much in agreement with the one you quote at the end of your post. I am very much for scientists, engineers, doctors, economists, anyone having political views and participating in t… (View Post)3 -
Re: It’s surely less than a 74% chance that the CON will win both? – politicalbetting.com
Well, just look at public trust in lawyers for your answer. EDIT: More seriously, it is again not wrong for lawyers to have political views, or even to use the law to derive their political opinions.… (View Post)1 -
Re: It’s surely less than a 74% chance that the CON will win both? – politicalbetting.com
It is not. Seeking to give their (mostly political) opinions more weight by using their 'scientist' brand is what is objectionable, largely because the process by which they seek to do that is nearly… (View Post)5