TheWhiteRabbit
-
Re: Today’s Times main leader won’t go down well at Number 10 – politicalbetting.com
Just to be clear, if you require cancer treatment on the NHS, the figures are: 1. Start with £100,000, finish with £100,000 2. Start with £250,000, finish with £250,000 3. Start with £500,000, finish… (View Post)1 -
Re: Reassuring CON voters 3 days before the Bexley by-election – politicalbetting.com
I was prepared to give BoJo the benefit of the doubt on that one and assume that the joke was understood by its singular intended recipient. I didn't even get it the first time, and I was a vac schem… (View Post)1 -
Re: Reassuring CON voters 3 days before the Bexley by-election – politicalbetting.com
90%??? It's a concept lost on 90% of trust lawyers. And the Court of Appeal, on occasion. So perhaps 99.999% would be more apppropriate. (View Post)2 -
Re: Crouching tiger, hidden dragon – politicalbetting.com
I feel like I have to point this out all the time, but the cap will only affect a small number of people. First, because it is only care costs (and not hotel costs) and, secondly, because most people… (View Post)1 -
Re: Crouching tiger, hidden dragon – politicalbetting.com
Bit late to the party, but the graph is very misleading, since it assumes an essentially unlimited extent of care spending. In reality, only a small percentage of people will hit the cap on care cost… (View Post)2