-
Re: The widespread notion that LAB can automatically assume 2nd prefs of LDs is not supported by real li
More Johnson , surely: massively over-promised, under-delivered, and insisting everything is great while we're all watching the shambles unfold2 -
Re: The widespread notion that LAB can automatically assume 2nd prefs of LDs is not supported by real li
The Liberals were in favour of PR when they _were_ winning huge outright majorities. So, unlikely they'd change their position in such circumstances.1 -
Re: The widespread notion that LAB can automatically assume 2nd prefs of LDs is not supported by real li
A reference to another form of football (American), obviously. What else could you possibly be thinking of? ;)1 -
Re: The widespread notion that LAB can automatically assume 2nd prefs of LDs is not supported by real li
I was more thinking along the lines that in the south, LibDems see the clear enemy as being the Tories, while in the north it's often Labour they are opposing. When I was in the LibDems, at party con…1 -
Re: The widespread notion that LAB can automatically assume 2nd prefs of LDs is not supported by real li
All those five contests in the graph are, broadly speaking, located from the Midlands northwards; I strongly suspect that a similar analysis for elections in the south east and south west would give …1
