Stuartinromford
Stuartinromford
Reactions
-
Re: NIC Reeves and the wonder stuff – politicalbetting.com
That works if all of them do it. We sort of saw that in 2010- the disagreement was about how to do austerity, not whether to do it. The temptation to be the one party saying "we don't need to do… (View Post)3 -
Re: NIC Reeves and the wonder stuff – politicalbetting.com
No, definitely Boltzmann- too skewed for a normal distribution. Besides, one of the New Scientist articles I read 35 years ago, when I wanted to signal my keenness as an A Level student, was about ap… (View Post)2 -
Re: NIC Reeves and the wonder stuff – politicalbetting.com
Besides, it's not up to the MPs. Jenrick undoubtedly has enough support from MPs to make the final two. And in opposition, there's no excuse to fiddle the process, as was done for the post-Truss elec… (View Post)1 -
Re: NIC Reeves and the wonder stuff – politicalbetting.com
I reckon that's the bit that's different now- for those at the far end of the Boltzmann distribution, the only utility they get from their wealth is as a number to keep score with, to know that they … (View Post)3 -
Re: NIC Reeves and the wonder stuff – politicalbetting.com
Thatcher and Howe raised taxes fairly aggressively from 1979 to 1982. It requires an attention span and perspective longer than Permanews allows for, but stabilising the public finances to free up le… (View Post)3
