Stuartinromford
Stuartinromford
Reactions
-
Re: Vichy 2.0 – politicalbetting.com
It's quite possible that the answer is neither. Trump could just be doing this because he can, to show that he can. (View Post)2 -
Re: Vichy 2.0 – politicalbetting.com
Put another way, 67 votes is an incredibly high bar in a partisan setup. The implication is that 33 votes, or 17 states worth of Senators, is a blocking minority. Falling below that level is essentia… (View Post)1 -
Re: Ed Miliband is now the second favourite to be the next Prime Minister – politicalbetting.com
Trouble is, we currently have the worst of both worlds. Enough snark to put off the well-meaning, but not enough to deflate the crooks and crazies. (View Post)1 -
Re: The polling brings bad news for Starmer – politicalbetting.com
Because: a) they're treacherous scumbags b) they will happily print anything that makes the Labour party look bad c) they could. The question that access journalists (like Shipman and Kuenssberg… (View Post)2 -
Re: The polling brings bad news for Starmer – politicalbetting.com
Heck, there are days when I'd want to hide being a government MP from myself. (View Post)1
