Stuartinromford
Stuartinromford
Reactions
-
Re: A 64/1 trading bet? – politicalbetting.com
Ooh, is it a game of Spot The Fact? I reckon there are at leave five verifiable bits of information in there. Which is five more than a typical Boris Johnson column over the years. How many can you f… (View Post)2 -
Re: A 64/1 trading bet? – politicalbetting.com
A prospective candidate went in Havering a few weeks back. Perhaps being a magnet for all the Corbynites disgusted by Horrible Old Starmer wasn't such a bright idea after all. (View Post)4 -
Re: Yes we Kam? – politicalbetting.com
That "older = more expensive" is probably part of the problem. The only way it can be justified is if your value to your employer continues to increase with age, and that's probably no… (View Post)1 -
Re: Yes we Kam? – politicalbetting.com
Overall, the benefits bill has wobbled around an average for decades. A chart from The Economist; https://www.economist.com/britain/2025/10/23/britains-welfare-system-has-grown-sicker A fair bit of w… (View Post)1 -
Re: Yes we Kam? – politicalbetting.com
Mugs, that's who. But you only need to find one mug somewhere in the world to be quids in. After all, if it's listed at £500, it must be valuable... Then again, who uses decanters any more?… (View Post)1
