Stereodog
-
Re: I visited IllicitEncounters.com so you don’t have to – politicalbetting.com
Yes that's a fair point but the argument I wanted to make was that we used to live in a climate where every gay person was widely seen as a potential risk to children based on fear and a few hig… (View Post)1 -
Re: I visited IllicitEncounters.com so you don’t have to – politicalbetting.com
You seem a bit obsessed with male genitalia today. (View Post)1 -
Re: I visited IllicitEncounters.com so you don’t have to – politicalbetting.com
This was my problem with your otherwise excellent previous thread. I agree that trans women shouldn't be allowed to compete with biological women in most sports but what evidence do you have oth… (View Post)2 -
Re: Phallic Drift – politicalbetting.com
It's kind of the opposite of Section 28 but with the same effect. Section 28 was a horrible piece of legislation driven by a toxic public discourse. Here a reasonable legal judgement is in dange… (View Post)1 -
Re: Phallic Drift – politicalbetting.com
It's taken me a few days to digest the Supreme Court ruling and whilst I think it was correct, I am deeply worried by some of the media narrative around it which I'm afraid is reflected in … (View Post)10
