I don't believe any of the reviews did a meta-analysis, so I'm not sure that they will have excluded based on quality. In a meta-analysis you'd weight or possibly exclude, but the synt… (View Post)

@148grss got to go to a meeting now, so may seem that I ignore you, but I'll check back later (View Post)

WPATH adherents will be against the Cass Review, I should think, given it points out the lack of evidence underlying WPATH guidelines. It's important to note that that is a lack of evidence, for… (View Post)

The systematic reviews commissioned to support the Cass Review did not limit on study type - there was no RCT restriction. If there's something in the Cass review that excludes non-RCT evidence,… (View Post)

She's been producing non-stop shit for years, so I would think repeated returns to the 'throne' are a given. (View Post)