Richard_Tyndall
Richard_Tyndall
Reactions
-
Re: Why you shouldn’t read too much into small unweighted subsamples – politicalbetting.com
The ony counterpoint I have been able to find so far - in a very quick scan - is this: https://democrats-science.house.gov/news/press-releases/ranking-member-lofgren-floor-statement-for-the-record-on… (View Post)1 -
Re: Why you shouldn’t read too much into small unweighted subsamples – politicalbetting.com
Sadly, given the Chagosian reaction today, it seems they have managed to take a win and turn it into a serious loss. Giving it back to the Chagosians would have been righting a serious wrong. Giving … (View Post)2 -
Re: Why you shouldn’t read too much into small unweighted subsamples – politicalbetting.com
I never saw the BBC as being part of the 'Alt-right mediabitches' From the BBC article on the decision. "But Frankie Bontemps, a second generation Chagossian in the UK, told the BBC th… (View Post)2 -
Re: Why you shouldn’t read too much into small unweighted subsamples – politicalbetting.com
Absolutely. That has always been my position. Indeed I would like them to make that decision sooner rather tha later but they seem to be in no rush to do so. (View Post)1 -
Re: Why you shouldn’t read too much into small unweighted subsamples – politicalbetting.com
A lot of the Chagossians have been working with the British Government administering the MPA. I suspect they can see all their long years of hard work going down the plughole, particularly if Mauriti… (View Post)2
