Richard_Tyndall
Richard_Tyndall
Reactions
-
Re: Four CON MPs to become peers – but no by-elections – politicalbetting.com
No, we need exactly the opposite; weaker parties with less opportunity to threaten and bribe MPs. The less power the party system has over MPs, the harder it is for a small clique to take control and… (View Post)1 -
Re: Four CON MPs to become peers – but no by-elections – politicalbetting.com
Ah that's sad. But good innings. (View Post)4 -
Re: Four CON MPs to become peers – but no by-elections – politicalbetting.com
Well they are what people claim are their greatest concerns. But I wonder how much of a disconnect there is between those claimed issues and what people actually vote on in the polling booth. I suspe… (View Post)1 -
Re: Four CON MPs to become peers – but no by-elections – politicalbetting.com
I agree with you on your first point as long as there is no way for parties to claim the result was a vote for the party rather than the MP. Not really considered the Primary system before. That is i… (View Post)1 -
Re: Four CON MPs to become peers – but no by-elections – politicalbetting.com
Slightly misleading table to the extent that it uses both 0% (taxpayers earning more than £1M) and 'less than 1%' (Transgender and Jewish) for the same small but non-zero value. Differentia… (View Post)2
