Richard_Tyndall
Richard_Tyndall
Reactions
-
Re: The by-election betting – a LAB gain and CON hold – politicalbetting.com
The point being they were an even bigger shit show when they were in public hands. Privatisation gave us the ability to move away from them. I had Mercury and then Virgin (and a hugely better service… (View Post)1 -
Re: The by-election betting – a LAB gain and CON hold – politicalbetting.com
Thanks for the warning. Though to be fair you drunk postings will probably still make more sense than some of the contributions we get here. :) (View Post)1 -
Re: The by-election betting – a LAB gain and CON hold – politicalbetting.com
One helped galvanise the other. The idea that BT would be better now if it were still in public hands - particularly if it still had the telecoms monopoly as it did until pivatisation, is for the bir… (View Post)1 -
Re: The by-election betting – a LAB gain and CON hold – politicalbetting.com
You clearly don't remember the stalinist system that existed when it was run by the Post Office. You want a new phone line. Make sure you are at home in the afternoon in 4 months time. Oh and we… (View Post)1 -
Re: The by-election betting – a LAB gain and CON hold – politicalbetting.com
Privatisation of the telephone system certainly wasn't disastrous. It was transformative in a positive way. (View Post)2
