Richard_Nabavi
-
Re: BREXIT. Undoing (some of) the damage. Part 2: From Principles to Policies – politicalbetting.com
Your point on hysteresis is a very good one, but I don't think that's a reason for Labour not to make specific proposals as at today. Keir Starmer could easily give a speech where he points… (View Post)1 -
Re: BREXIT. Undoing (some of) the damage. Part 2: From Principles to Policies – politicalbetting.com
LOL! See Part 1. My first principle: "1. No fantasy. This means forgetting about rejoining the EU " Not very smart, are you? (View Post)6 -
Re: BREXIT. Undoing (some of) the damage. Part 2: From Principles to Policies – politicalbetting.com
No, I've never said we should stay in the EMA. I don't even know if that's legally possible, but either way I'm perfectly happy with having our own MHRA running this. I did sugges… (View Post)1 -
Re: BREXIT. Undoing (some of) the damage. Part 2: From Principles to Policies – politicalbetting.com
The issue with creating our own equivalent of REACH (at a cost estimated at £1bn to the UK industry) is that it it is like writing your own bespoke accounting system at vast cost when you can get one… (View Post)3 -
Re: BREXIT. Undoing (some of) the damage. Part 2: From Principles to Policies – politicalbetting.com
How an opposition party should frame policy on this is an interesting conundrum. I take the point about 'slightly recanting on Brexit', but that is to fall into the government's spin t… (View Post)9
