Pro_Rata
-
Re: Weak? Or dishonourable? – politicalbetting.com
Excellent header Cyclefree. I'd also like, belatedly, to thank you for engaging on a previous thread on the Scottish gender legislation, which I did write up a response for, but then pitched int… (View Post)1 -
Re: Weak? Or dishonourable? – politicalbetting.com
I think the switching table likely overplays Con->Lab, Con->RefUK and underplays Con->LD and Con->DNV. https://images.app.goo.gl/xujaeDjf3bDftZYh9 (View Post)1 -
Re: Weak? Or dishonourable? – politicalbetting.com
I'd add that Sunak has shown he is capable of working fast and on a degree of instinct, as with getting the COVID packages together, when others are breathing down his neck. To be a better PM he… (View Post)2 -
Re: Should LAB be worried by this word cloud? – politicalbetting.com
Literally. Like the old joke where what you wish for is at the bottom of the slide that goes giiin, whiskeeey, weeeeee. And itching to see Stuart pull the Scottish subsample for v that one :) (View Post)1 -
Re: Nikki Haley at 17/1 looks value for the WH2024 GOP nomination – politicalbetting.com
I think DavidL's comments yesterday on what "careless" actually means in terms of tax law, and Zahawi's admission of "carelessness" is plenty as to not necessitate furth… (View Post)1
