Pro_Rata
-
Re: The Intermarium – politicalbetting.com
You know, for all we like this place for he diversity of perspective and opinion (albeit from a cohort that is broadly well off, ageing and tends centrist), it is the evocativeness of familiarity tha… (View Post)2 -
Re: Weak? Or dishonourable? – politicalbetting.com
Excellent header Cyclefree. I'd also like, belatedly, to thank you for engaging on a previous thread on the Scottish gender legislation, which I did write up a response for, but then pitched int… (View Post)1 -
Re: Weak? Or dishonourable? – politicalbetting.com
I think the switching table likely overplays Con->Lab, Con->RefUK and underplays Con->LD and Con->DNV. https://images.app.goo.gl/xujaeDjf3bDftZYh9 (View Post)1 -
Re: Weak? Or dishonourable? – politicalbetting.com
I'd add that Sunak has shown he is capable of working fast and on a degree of instinct, as with getting the COVID packages together, when others are breathing down his neck. To be a better PM he… (View Post)2 -
Re: Should LAB be worried by this word cloud? – politicalbetting.com
Literally. Like the old joke where what you wish for is at the bottom of the slide that goes giiin, whiskeeey, weeeeee. And itching to see Stuart pull the Scottish subsample for v that one :) (View Post)1
