No I think we understand full well what scenario means. The question is why the scenarios which don't result in catastrophe aren't included in the SAGE evidence. Scenarios that don't result in catast… (View Post)

Well exactly. The problem is that hasn't been done by SAGE. Instead they ran all the scenarios where X presented a catastrophe then only showed those. They didn't show scenarios based on X where it d… (View Post)

The various input parameters were presented as scenarios and talked about as such so yes that's what we're talking about. The evidence shows that it might be more benign so that input parameter shoul… (View Post)

It is what you were saying. If I'm wrong, then say how I'm wrong, just because you don't like getting called out. Its for the ministers to decide what outcome they take, not the scientists. That's wh… (View Post)

No you've missed the point. Absolutely I 100% agree that the scenarios should be on things like "do nothing" etc. The problem isn't that the optimistic scenarios have been excluded, the pro… (View Post)