Phil
-
Re: Your regular reminder that words matter – politicalbetting.com
Based on the court case, anyone would reasonably conclude that Letby was probably guilty. If you based your opinion on having attended the case, you’d draw the same conclusion that the jury did. The … (View Post)2 -
Re: Your regular reminder that words matter – politicalbetting.com
No, the reason is that the defence’s own witnesses supported the claim that 2 babies were overdosed on insulin at the time. That’s the reason they weren’t called - the defence could see that they wou… (View Post)3 -
Re: Your regular reminder that words matter – politicalbetting.com
Indeed. Asking Letby to draw conclusions based on the insulin evidence was arguably an abuse of the court system - she simply wasn’t qualified to give answers to those questions. It was the legal equ… (View Post)1 -
Re: Your regular reminder that words matter – politicalbetting.com
US East 1 is the original & first AWS datacentre. Many companies have ended up with a dependency on US-East 1 because they started there & never built out geographic redundancy. On top of tha… (View Post)1 -
Re: Your regular reminder that words matter – politicalbetting.com
The answer to your last question was revealed in the a recent Private Eye article on the topic. Trials like these always pre-trial hearings where the expert evidence is discussed & the points the… (View Post)2
