Phil
-
Re: Oh, Angie, don’t you weep – politicalbetting.com
Never let a good crisis go to waste. (View Post)1 -
Re: Oh, Angie, don’t you weep – politicalbetting.com
My counter to this argument is simple: if she knew she was being dishonest, then she would also have known that she only had to wait six months for her son to be of age at which point she would no lo… (View Post)7 -
Re: Oh, Angie, don’t you weep – politicalbetting.com
It’s especially counter-intuitive because the laws around trusts for vulnerable people are drawn up to make sure that the trustees are not liable for lots of taxes that would otherwise accrue to them… (View Post)1 -
Re: Oh, Angie, don’t you weep – politicalbetting.com
It can’t be fraud if it wasn’t done knowingly & there’s no evidence that Rayner deliberately chose to pay the wrong rate of stamp duty. Given that she only had to wait six months for her son to r… (View Post)3 -
Re: Oh, Angie, don’t you weep – politicalbetting.com
Raynor also claimed to have consulted two different trust lawyers, as well as her conveyancers. I presume those consultations turned out to be imaginary, or at the very least wildly insufficient to p… (View Post)2
