Phil
-
Re: PB Predictions Competition 2025 – The (first) results are in! – politicalbetting.com
David Allen Green wrote about the choice as to whether a defence should call their own expert witnesses & the risk that they might say things that undermine your client here:… (View Post)1 -
Re: PB Predictions Competition 2025 – The (first) results are in! – politicalbetting.com
The defence took the view that undermining the chief prosecution witness was their best possible approach. The jury disagreed with them. As to why Letby accepted that the babies had been poisoned by … (View Post)2 -
Re: PB Predictions Competition 2025 – The (first) results are in! – politicalbetting.com
FPT: Was Hammond writing MD during the MMR debacle? Not Private Eye’s finest hour... (View Post)2 -
Re: Punters take a dim view of the Reform contretemps – politicalbetting.com
Unfortunately impossible to compare as they downgraded the unit from a level 2 that was taking level 3 babies to strictly level 1 immediately after they kicked her out. It’s almost as if they knew th… (View Post)4 -
Re: Punters take a dim view of the Reform contretemps – politicalbetting.com
Returning to an old topic: I note in passing that both Private Eye & Unherd now take it as a given that Lucy Letby is almost certainly innocent & the trial against her a travesty of justice: … (View Post)1