Peter_the_Punter
-
Re: PB Predictions Competition 2025 – The (first) results are in! – politicalbetting.com
When I first heard about the DNA evidence I was surprised but assumed it was definitive. On examination it turns out to be flaky, for a number of reasons. The main one is that such testing was not ev… (View Post)1 -
Re: PB Predictions Competition 2025 – The (first) results are in! – politicalbetting.com
Foot probably knew more than he could publish. In the end I think he was agnostic on the matter. One thing that is almost universally acknowledged now is that Hanratty should have been acquitted on t… (View Post)2 -
Re: Punters take a dim view of the Reform contretemps – politicalbetting.com
The biggest takeaway for me from the four juries I sat on was that they varied enormously in quality. In fact I came away with the distinct view that if you were a guilty defendant, the stupider the … (View Post)2 -
Re: PB Predictions Competition 2025 – The (first) results are in! – politicalbetting.com
He probably was, but we will never know. If you are thinking of the DNA evidence, it was deeply flawed but I suspect it will be the last word on the subject. (View Post)1 -
Re: PB Predictions Competition 2025 – The (first) results are in! – politicalbetting.com
FPT The biggest takeaway for me from the four juries I sat on was that they varied enormously in quality. In fact I came away with the distinct view that if you were a guilty defendant, the stupider … (View Post)6