But it wasn't. It was questioned at the time. The incumbent was doing a good job. Why take a risk? That's the question that is so far not being answered, or even investigated. Why was he ap… (View Post)

It's a point made very openly and succinctly by Frank Gardner: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/czx3lq460n6t?page=4 (View Post)

He's certainly trying to edge some of the responsibilities over on to the security services, but there is only so far he can go in that direction without getting pushback, even if he has some ju… (View Post)

Quite possibly because he feared the man in question. Had you considered that? Politics is a tough game. (View Post)

Yeah, but he was supposed to scam Trump and his goons, not us. Fail. (View Post)