Peter_the_Punter
-
Re: What are Ministers for? – politicalbetting.com
I do agree. What makes the PO's position so indefensible is that when the problems with Horizon became apparent, it doubled down on its assertions that it was robust, and continued to prosecute. (View Post)3 -
Re: What are Ministers for? – politicalbetting.com
She speaks for a large chunk of Daily Mail readers. That is not quite the same as a large chunk of the Conservative base. The current shenanigans are all about positioning for the Party Leadership af… (View Post)2 -
Re: What are Ministers for? – politicalbetting.com
He was my MP too, Ian. (Wanstead, since you ask.) I thought he was an ok sort in a tradition that is in decline in the Tory Party these days. Judge as you find. Without his efforts, it is doubtful th… (View Post)1 -
Re: What are Ministers for? – politicalbetting.com
She could doubtless do it. Meanwhile Nick Wallis's account is pretty good, and very readable. (View Post)2 -
Re: What are Ministers for? – politicalbetting.com
Yes, some come out of it very well. It's worth naming them: Constituency MPs Lord Arbuthnot Investigative journalists (Nick Wallis et al) Computer weekly Panorama Private Eye Second Sight Mr Jus… (View Post)5