NickPalmer
NickPalmer
Reactions
-
Re: The widespread notion that LAB can automatically assume 2nd prefs of LDs is not supported by real li
A subtle point is how it changes things if there's (a) an official pact (b) a failure of one party to contest the seat, with no overt explanation or (c) a "paper candidate" non-campaig… (View Post)1 -
Re: Remember that a CON-LD swing smaller than in C&A in 1990 led to Maggie going within a month – politi
In principle I see her point. A problem is that so many jobs are in the south - you can build houses very cheaply on the Yorkshire Moors, but demand is limited, and the sort of places that most devel… (View Post)2 -
Re: The LDs take Chesham and Amersham with a 25% CON to LD swing – politicalbetting.com
What's happening in the south is that non-Tory voters are largely unpartisan these days, spurred on by the lack of noticable policy by any of the non-Tory parties. The visceral Labour anti-LD vo… (View Post)3 -
Re: The LDs take Chesham and Amersham with a 25% CON to LD swing – politicalbetting.com
Genuinely awesome LibDem result which I regret not staying up for - kudos to Mike for having pointed us at it for weeks. It'll be fascinating to see what the national polls do now. Clearly a ris… (View Post)5 -
Re: One thing we thankfully haven’t seen in the UK – a political divide on being vaccinated – politicalb
Result expected ~"between 1 and 3am" according to #Britainelects. Tories out to 1.18 (last matched 1.25) and slightly larger sums being bet, but still a very illiquid market. I'm going… (View Post)1
