NickPalmer
NickPalmer
Reactions
-
Re: Old Bexley & Sidcup: The betting overstates CON chances – politicalbetting.com
Be still my beating heart. (View Post)7 -
Re: Whenever the LDs have issued data like this they’ve won – politicalbetting.com
Starmer and Rayner clearly don't have a warm relationship, but they are elected separately, so Starmer couldn't sack her even if he wanted to, which I don't think he does. Conversely, … (View Post)2 -
Re: Whenever the LDs have issued data like this they’ve won – politicalbetting.com
I think there has been an interesting de facto deal which (I believe) has never even been discussed privately - the LibDems are standing in Bexley but not trying very hard, and Labour is standing in … (View Post)1 -
Re: Whenever the LDs have issued data like this they’ve won – politicalbetting.com
I'm not sure they've cut through particularly - the only references I've seen to it until today were on PB. I'm sure Twitter has had lots, but that's not the general public. … (View Post)3 -
Re: It’s surely less than a 74% chance that the CON will win both? – politicalbetting.com
Interesting discussion. From my limited experience, the problem of experts in another field entering politics is not that they are bad at developing new skills, but rather that they cling to their ar… (View Post)3
