MrEd
-
Re: Why Burnham shouldn’t be the favourite to succeed Starmer – politicalbetting.com
Depends on your definition of coup. Chris Mullins “A Very British Coup” didn’t have tanks on the street or mass riots. But it did have Harry Perkins kicked out by behind the scenes means. Don’t think… (View Post)1 -
Re: Why Burnham shouldn’t be the favourite to succeed Starmer – politicalbetting.com
Again, the Red Mist descends. Hilary Clinton, and the claims that Trump was a Russian plant poisoned the electoral well in the US to the point we now have many Democrats saying that the Republicans c… (View Post)0 -
Re: Why Burnham shouldn’t be the favourite to succeed Starmer – politicalbetting.com
The Red Mist around Trump is descending again. My comment on Biden and Afghanistan was around his waving away of people dying in an horrific way as a minor detail. It was the behaviour one might expe… (View Post)2 -
Re: Why Burnham shouldn’t be the favourite to succeed Starmer – politicalbetting.com
It’s an agenda - he’s saying one of the worst mistake of the whole pandemic was Oxford giving the vaccine to AZ and that was because of pressure from the U.K. Government ie it’s the fault of that nas… (View Post)3 -
Re: Why Burnham shouldn’t be the favourite to succeed Starmer – politicalbetting.com
Off topic, and I usually don’t wade into COVID topics, one of the things that is becoming increasingly obvious is just how much of an effective hit job the US Pharma companies - and Pfizer in particu… (View Post)5