Morris_Dancer
-
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
I agree with you that there are drawbacks, but I think those are worth putting up with for the benefits. And the change is not being proposed for a better system but purely as a cost-cutting measure. (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
But abolishing trial by jury and inflicting compulsory ID scratches Starmer's authoritarian itch. (View Post)5 -
Re: A 28% return in just over a month? – politicalbetting.com
Good morning, everyone. Nothing says patriotic like compulsory ID cards and abolishing trial by jury. Is a system over a thousand years old really one that works? F1: Newey as team principal at Aston… (View Post)2 -
Re: What the public expects from the budget – politicalbetting.com
They get to spend more on benefits and feel self-righteous. Not sure abolishing juries and rising tax on working people will go down well. If they'd cut benefits as well as increasing tax that w… (View Post)1 -
Re: What the public expects from the budget – politicalbetting.com
Enough to meet essentials, with a small amount left over for minor luxuries (meals out, cinema etc) and modest saving. (View Post)1