Morris_Dancer
-
Re: Why you shouldn’t read too much into small unweighted subsamples – politicalbetting.com
Ok, politically the decision seems unwise, and environmentally it's going to be bad, and strategically it's obviously stupid, and morally it's a bit bizarre, but apart from that seems like a winner f… (View Post)1 -
Re: Why you shouldn’t read too much into small unweighted subsamples – politicalbetting.com
So, is Keir Starmer daft, or has he received a suit or two from tailors in Shanghai? (View Post)1 -
Re: Why you shouldn’t read too much into small unweighted subsamples – politicalbetting.com
Good morning, everyone. Mr. Dopermean, a thousand years ago when I was writing fiction, I accidentally sent a beta reader a copy of a draft containing my own notes (which tend to be very sarcasticall… (View Post)1 -
Re: Why you shouldn’t read too much into small unweighted subsamples – politicalbetting.com
Mr. Password, aye. The UN as-is is better than no UN, but it's a long way from what it might be. Mind you that might be due to countries not being what they might be. (View Post)2 -
Re: After the Veep debate Trump is now the favourite – politicalbetting.com
Mr. Tyndall, fair enough; I'm glad you're liking it. (View Post)1