MoonRabbit
-
Re: Defining legacies – politicalbetting.com
You don’t want him to seem interesting and human this side of the election? (View Post)1 -
Re: Defining legacies – politicalbetting.com
Bollocks. (View Post)1 -
Re: Defining legacies – politicalbetting.com
Chill. Come election Greens could end up with no seats, and squeezed down tactically to 3% or less. Calculators give them 2 seats based on polls giving them 6-8%. They won’t get 6-8%. Their Brighton … (View Post)1 -
Re: When political betting can get you into trouble – politicalbetting.com
Mercer grabbed Wes into neck lock and dragged him off screen, in last weeks spin room. (View Post)1 -
Re: When political betting can get you into trouble – politicalbetting.com
Like last week, Still got to give it a day or so to make further estimation of what just went on. I stand by Starmer wafferly, doesn’t give clear answers, and when in a spot reaches for weird things.… (View Post)1
