Malmesbury
Malmesbury
Reactions
-
Re: Reform’s leads falls by 5% if you exclude non-voters – politicalbetting.com
1) each instance of deliberately employing someone illegally is punishable by a £100k fine. This includes a number of crimes including visa sale 2) use the Proceeds of Crime laws to prevent hiding as… (View Post)1 -
Re: Reform’s leads falls by 5% if you exclude non-voters – politicalbetting.com
My plan to collapse the black economy would collapse demand. - doesn’t depend on the French - Breaks no law, international or national - Fucks up the scum who exploit - Offers the migrants justice ag… (View Post)2 -
Re: Reform’s leads falls by 5% if you exclude non-voters – politicalbetting.com
“Right, chaps, we are going to row from Antarctica to South Georgia.” “OK boss” “In winter” “OK boss” “In a dingy” “OK boss” “Fixed seat, arms only, rowing” “WTF?” (View Post)1 -
Re: Reform’s leads falls by 5% if you exclude non-voters – politicalbetting.com
Google the “Libyan Coastguard” Basically, the EU pays them to patrol off Libya (and ignores them going further afield). The LC is a heavily armed militia. They capture migrant ships/boats, and impris… (View Post)1 -
Re: Reform’s leads falls by 5% if you exclude non-voters – politicalbetting.com
The final pieces you are missing are 1) share the fine with the person reporting/giving evidence. 2) give them indefinite leave to remain, if they need it. Suddenly, every illegally employed worker i… (View Post)1
