Malmesbury
Malmesbury
Reactions
-
Re: A nuclear deterrent – politicalbetting.com
The it was taken as a Fuck Off Offer at the time - they weren't interested. The assumption was that the French missile industry was worried that there would be UK workshare and hence money/job l… (View Post)1 -
Re: A nuclear deterrent – politicalbetting.com
The weapons we build are actually to joint US/UK designs - US version of the weapons integrate the UK features and they were designed by teams with UK members. The French were really upset that we go… (View Post)1 -
Re: A nuclear deterrent – politicalbetting.com
Er.. that isn't what he said - he's trying to make a case that Ed Davey has been right on international affairs previously. Which is arguable. Trump is obviously a loose cannon and an unrel… (View Post)1 -
Re: A nuclear deterrent – politicalbetting.com
"Dead man" systems are proven stupid - see Herman Kahn, "On Thermonuclear War", 1960 The Russian stories about having one sound exactly like their other bullshitting about weapons. (View Post)1 -
Re: A nuclear deterrent – politicalbetting.com
OT It’s perfectly possible to build a two/three stage missile that will take a nuclear warhead to Moscow, or pretty much anywhere. And to do so for reasonable cost. The South Korean Hyunmoo-5, which … (View Post)3
