Malmesbury
-
Re: Angela Rayner is in touch with the public (sadly they are both wrong) – politicalbetting.com
Elite postmen (and women) reduce a barking, attacking XXXXXXL Bully to a quivering heap with a single gesture. Bit like elite teachers can reduce a class of 30 fighting children to order with an eyeb… (View Post)2 -
Re: Angela Rayner is in touch with the public (sadly they are both wrong) – politicalbetting.com
Training video here - https://youtu.be/udQM_DbATFk?si=olZULsbR0eT8iVoZ Note the critical mistake (View Post)1 -
Re: Angela Rayner is in touch with the public (sadly they are both wrong) – politicalbetting.com
On the @NU10K and restricting the franchise to just them. It’s already happened. Why do you think Starmer is in office, but not in power? It’s only partly his uselessness. The Process State cruises o… (View Post)1 -
Re: Angela Rayner is in touch with the public (sadly they are both wrong) – politicalbetting.com
£200 pounds a year income at the time of the Putney debates is £42k a year now (Bank of England inflation calculator) Of course that needs to be income from land. Elections will be much easier to hol… (View Post)1 -
Re: We need to talk about electoral reform as it has betting implications – politicalbetting.com
And we have a postie who paints houses. (View Post)1