Malmesbury
Malmesbury
Reactions
-
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
The comments on the abolition of Grand Juries in the UK are of interest.... 1933 Edward Cavendish, Marquess of Hartington MP (Con) - Whilst there might be an overwhelming case to abolish Grand Juries… (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
a Interestingly, such URL probing might e considered to come under the computer misuse laws. The funniest version of that was a case in the US, where an idiot prosecutor tried to claim *reading the d… (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Don't tend to talk direct politics with other adults - apart from the usual damn the government stuff. Clear from the things they damn the government for, that about half of them are to the left of m… (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
a Hang on, I thought tourist taxes were an awesome way to preserve the character of localities, prevent over touristing, and raise revenue? Or have I got my cue cards muddled up again? https://www.th… (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
But apparently we have billions for digital ID, but no money to employ more Clerks of the Court to line everything up (including juries) for the courts? Or is this an example of feast-or-famine gover… (View Post)1
