Malmesbury
Malmesbury
Reactions
-
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
As yes. Important points of principle. But who decides. I mean, a minor publisher of a hate rag being sent down isn’t important, right? At least according to the government… https://en.wikipedia.org/… (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Which was ANs point. There was an excellent BBC documentary about day to day life in the border areas in the 80s - can’t find it… One part dealt with a local quarry. Since explosives would be a magne… (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
What he was advocating was actually done. The opposing view was not to use active intelligence operations against the paramilitaries, hunker down in fortified bases and let the Men Of Violence get on… (View Post)2 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
I just want to get this right - 1) not spending £700 million on saving a handful of salmon risks violating human rights and international law. 2) using automated facial recognition, which has an exte… (View Post)1 -
Re: A 28% return in just over a month? – politicalbetting.com
Rewatching this highly important documentary on the issues of rural policing - https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0425112/?ref_=ext_shr_lnk “I does for this’ in” (View Post)1
