Malmesbury
-
Re: Are John Rentoul and Dan Hodges right? – politicalbetting.com
If you show the slightest evidence of being conciliatory, you will be ignored. Then people wonder why every pressure group is absolutist. (View Post)1 -
Re: Are John Rentoul and Dan Hodges right? – politicalbetting.com
There is a deeper issue, here. A structural one. The “facilities designed by people who do not understand disability, or without thinking about it” This pattern repeats - something designed and creat… (View Post)1 -
Re: Are John Rentoul and Dan Hodges right? – politicalbetting.com
The big difference with the railways (and canals) was that the horse trading happened before the parliamentary bills. Once that was done, the engineers ran the projects. (View Post)2 -
Re: Are John Rentoul and Dan Hodges right? – politicalbetting.com
South Korea is a crowded place, with a high level of development, modern safety standards. They can build infrastructure better, faster and cheaper. The issue is more, I think, to do with a culture o… (View Post)2 -
Re: Are John Rentoul and Dan Hodges right? – politicalbetting.com
What happens is that managers with no domain knowledge each add a “policy initiative” that has their personal chop on it. These policies may be ludicrous and/or impossibly expensive. See the social e… (View Post)1
