Malmesbury
Malmesbury
Reactions
-
Re: Labour’s Liz Truss problem x 100 – politicalbetting.com
That was what I was referencing. If all the medics were philosopher kings from Plato, maaaaaybe. But there are too many who aren't. (View Post)1 -
Re: Labour’s Liz Truss problem x 100 – politicalbetting.com
The reason why private companies often offer (for free) private health care to staff is exactly this - it saves the company money to get testing and treatment done early. Some things - like knee repl… (View Post)2 -
Re: Labour’s Liz Truss problem x 100 – politicalbetting.com
The Economist did a study, years ago. A very reliable definition of “Rich bastards who need a soaking” is anyone who has twice the income they have. (View Post)2 -
Re: Labour’s Liz Truss problem x 100 – politicalbetting.com
There are more and more facilities for scanning and testing, run by non-NHS staff. Having used them, they are quite cheap and run on maximising throughput. (View Post)1 -
Re: Labour’s Liz Truss problem x 100 – politicalbetting.com
The absurd rationing of testing continues. I know more and more people who pay private facilities to get MRIs etc. XRays seem to be easier in the NHS system. Early detection of problems is cheaper. (View Post)2
