Malmesbury
Malmesbury
Reactions
-
Re: A nuclear deterrent – politicalbetting.com
The weapons we build are actually to joint US/UK designs - US version of the weapons integrate the UK features and they were designed by teams with UK members. The French were really upset that we go… (View Post)1 -
Re: A nuclear deterrent – politicalbetting.com
Er.. that isn't what he said - he's trying to make a case that Ed Davey has been right on international affairs previously. Which is arguable. Trump is obviously a loose cannon and an unrel… (View Post)1 -
Re: A nuclear deterrent – politicalbetting.com
"Dead man" systems are proven stupid - see Herman Kahn, "On Thermonuclear War", 1960 The Russian stories about having one sound exactly like their other bullshitting about weapons. (View Post)1 -
Re: A nuclear deterrent – politicalbetting.com
OT It’s perfectly possible to build a two/three stage missile that will take a nuclear warhead to Moscow, or pretty much anywhere. And to do so for reasonable cost. The South Korean Hyunmoo-5, which … (View Post)3 -
Re: A nuclear deterrent – politicalbetting.com
At low speeds, an advanced nuclear sub generates too little signal against background to be detectable by sonar, or heat, even a few hundred yards away. You need some kind of signal to track somethin… (View Post)1
