Malmesbury
Malmesbury
Reactions
-
Re: A nuclear deterrent – politicalbetting.com
Er.. that isn't what he said - he's trying to make a case that Ed Davey has been right on international affairs previously. Which is arguable. Trump is obviously a loose cannon and an unrel… (View Post)1 -
Re: A nuclear deterrent – politicalbetting.com
"Dead man" systems are proven stupid - see Herman Kahn, "On Thermonuclear War", 1960 The Russian stories about having one sound exactly like their other bullshitting about weapons. (View Post)1 -
Re: A nuclear deterrent – politicalbetting.com
OT It’s perfectly possible to build a two/three stage missile that will take a nuclear warhead to Moscow, or pretty much anywhere. And to do so for reasonable cost. The South Korean Hyunmoo-5, which … (View Post)3 -
Re: A nuclear deterrent – politicalbetting.com
At low speeds, an advanced nuclear sub generates too little signal against background to be detectable by sonar, or heat, even a few hundred yards away. You need some kind of signal to track somethin… (View Post)1 -
Re: A nuclear deterrent – politicalbetting.com
We actually have multiple tons of HEU in storage. And quite bit of plutonium. From the early designs in the 1950s. Uranium and plutonium last forever, basically. We’d only need to make more is we vas… (View Post)5
