Malmesbury
Malmesbury
Reactions
-
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
But apparently we have billions for digital ID, but no money to employ more Clerks of the Court to line everything up (including juries) for the courts? Or is this an example of feast-or-famine gover… (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
I've sat in a room with a judge delivering a biased set of decisions. The cultural context was interesting - they were probably unaware of how it looked. Then again, the legal threats against th… (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
It’s been the policy of successive governments to encourage people to use workplace pensions. Gordon Brown made it mandatory for financial advisors to advocate people using them. Even in the cases wh… (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
@Wogerdamus has spoken. Right, what price for a Tory majority next time? (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
As yes. Important points of principle. But who decides. I mean, a minor publisher of a hate rag being sent down isn’t important, right? At least according to the government… https://en.wikipedia.org/… (View Post)1
