Luckyguy1983
Luckyguy1983
Reactions
-
Re: A 64/1 trading bet? – politicalbetting.com
It is not quite the same idea, but there are a number of ex-serviceman (including a lot of men who couldn't get through military trainining) currently living rough, and I would absolutely have a… (View Post)1 -
Re: Yes we Kam? – politicalbetting.com
It isn't lack of a technical solution, it is lack of a market incentive for providing a technical solution. At the moment, renewables suppliers are richly rewarded for switching off when there… (View Post)1 -
Re: Yes we Kam? – politicalbetting.com
My initial post about it was here: https://vf.politicalbetting.com/discussion/comment/5493412#Comment_5493412 Note: A discussion ensued about whether David Turver's figures for gas generation in… (View Post)1 -
Re: Yes we Kam? – politicalbetting.com
What Lost Password is describing isn't a good thing for pity's sake. It means effectively that British billpayers are subsidising power that they aren't receiving - because the British… (View Post)3 -
Re: Generational damage – politicalbetting.com
Nevertheless, if it is not illegal, it is hard to see a justification for pornographic representations of it being made illegal. (View Post)1
