Luckyguy1983
Luckyguy1983
Reactions
-
Re: A 64/1 trading bet? – politicalbetting.com
Fact free drivel from a bitter old man. Rawnsley, not IanB2. (View Post)2 -
Re: Yes we Kam? – politicalbetting.com
Thanks. I would suggest you read the full piece linked above, which I should also have added (I did so later) in the second discussion to which you responded. It is fairly obvious to me what the subs… (View Post)1 -
Re: A 64/1 trading bet? – politicalbetting.com
It is not quite the same idea, but there are a number of ex-serviceman (including a lot of men who couldn't get through military trainining) currently living rough, and I would absolutely have a… (View Post)1 -
Re: Yes we Kam? – politicalbetting.com
It isn't lack of a technical solution, it is lack of a market incentive for providing a technical solution. At the moment, renewables suppliers are richly rewarded for switching off when there… (View Post)1 -
Re: Yes we Kam? – politicalbetting.com
My initial post about it was here: https://vf.politicalbetting.com/discussion/comment/5493412#Comment_5493412 Note: A discussion ensued about whether David Turver's figures for gas generation in… (View Post)1
