JohnO
-
Re: Meeks and Rentoul argue over Davey’s “No deals with CON” – politicalbetting.com
In those circumstances, sure, they could offer a vote but no Tory MP will be whipped to support it. And you were talking about the manifesto which patently is published before the election. That will… (View Post)2 -
Re: Meeks and Rentoul argue over Davey’s “No deals with CON” – politicalbetting.com
Anyway, there’s not the slightest chance of the next Conservative manifesto containing a commitment to restrict abortions to 22 weeks or any other level. It might conceivably pledge to have another v… (View Post)3 -
Re: Meeks and Rentoul argue over Davey’s “No deals with CON” – politicalbetting.com
If I were an MP, I’d support a reduction to 22 weeks but the notion that Tory MPs who disagree should be compelled to vote against their conscience is repulsive. (View Post)5 -
Re: Meeks and Rentoul argue over Davey’s “No deals with CON” – politicalbetting.com
Abortion (like capital punishment, gay marriage etc etc) has always been a matter of conscience for MPs. Are you suggesting that a whip should be applied in any future vote? (View Post)4 -
Re: Can Starmer get a conference boost? – politicalbetting.com
It does indeed. And against Angela Rayner. (View Post)1
