JohnLilburne
-
Re: Opinium: Apart from vaccines more think LAB would be doing better – politicalbetting.com
One of the times I did an e-consult I got an almost immediate call back - and missed it, mainly because I had been on my phone doing an e-consult and hit the wrong button. But of course there was no … (View Post)1 -
Re: Opinium: Apart from vaccines more think LAB would be doing better – politicalbetting.com
Uber Eats started up in my area during lockdown, and offered some great introductory deals. So on a couple of occasions I treated myself to a restaurant meal, delivered. Not only is there a delivery … (View Post)1 -
Re: Opinium: Apart from vaccines more think LAB would be doing better – politicalbetting.com
It would definitely fall under the statutory definition of terrorism if the threat was for a political reason rather than a personal. Terrorism Act 2000: (1) In this Act "terrorism" means t… (View Post)2 -
Re: The rise and rise of Trump in the WH2024 nomination betting – politicalbetting.com
No, because the courts have no jurisdiction over the Crown. Even I as a relatively junior Crown Servant have no contract, and am not covered by employment law. Instead there is a Civil Service Code w… (View Post)1 -
Re: The big speech reaction – politicalbetting.com
As I understand it, the law changed some time ago and references are no longer covered by qualified privilege. A lot of employers and other institutions have gone down this route. (View Post)1
