JohnLilburne
-
Re: The backlash against having more Milibands in the great offices of state than women begins
Back then of course the crime was being an accessory, either before or after the fact. Not sure why they changed the law. I take a hard view on this. If your son is a murderer, you should disown him.… (View Post)1 -
Re: The backlash against having more Milibands in the great offices of state than women begins
Surely this goes against hundreds of years of social conditioning that women need to be persuaded. "Yes, let's fuck" is deprecated, instead she has to pretend she isn't interested… (View Post)1 -
Re: The backlash against having more Milibands in the great offices of state than women begins
Wif means woman rather than wife, of course, and waepn in this context might mean penis. (View Post)1 -
Re: The backlash against having more Milibands in the great offices of state than women begins
Why wasn't the Home Office response "we thank the BBC for their help, he has been arrested and will be in the next flight to Iraq"? I understand that people circumvent the law, but it … (View Post)2 -
Re: Are John Rentoul and Dan Hodges right? – politicalbetting.com
I think the issue is that we think we are wasting the money, and any extra spend will equally be wasted. France apparently gets more defence for less spending for example. We can put one, maybe two, … (View Post)1
