JohnLilburne
-
Re: Opinium: Apart from vaccines more think LAB would be doing better – politicalbetting.com
It would definitely fall under the statutory definition of terrorism if the threat was for a political reason rather than a personal. Terrorism Act 2000: (1) In this Act "terrorism" means t… (View Post)2 -
Re: The rise and rise of Trump in the WH2024 nomination betting – politicalbetting.com
No, because the courts have no jurisdiction over the Crown. Even I as a relatively junior Crown Servant have no contract, and am not covered by employment law. Instead there is a Civil Service Code w… (View Post)1 -
Re: The big speech reaction – politicalbetting.com
As I understand it, the law changed some time ago and references are no longer covered by qualified privilege. A lot of employers and other institutions have gone down this route. (View Post)1 -
Re: The big speech reaction – politicalbetting.com
I wondered what an "upbeat demeaner" is. Presumably someone who demeans people, but in an upbeat way. Maybe as in letter-boxes and tank-topped bumboys. (View Post)3 -
Re: Truss once again topping the CONHome ratings – politicalbetting.com
I had no problem with it on the way into Swindon. On the way out I think I was a bit complacent, and ended up somewhere I did not want to be. Twice. (View Post)1
