Jim_the_Lurker
-
Re: Your regular reminder that the betting markets are frequently and spectacularly wrong
Although I am also suspicious that Sir Gav is just playing games, rather than being a true believer of disestablishment. Of course he knows he hasn’t got the votes to kick out the clerics, and I don’… (View Post)1 -
Re: The Butterfly Effect – Bush vs. Gore revisited – politicalbetting.com
Great header - I think the concept of “losers consent” doesn’t perhaps get the consideration it should. To some extent the Hilary Clinton campaign and Democrat party did the opposite to Gore. The les… (View Post)1 -
Re: The Butterfly Effect – Bush vs. Gore revisited – politicalbetting.com
I don’t think that is the point I am making. More that I seem to recall there was a group of Democrats who think Gore erred in conceding. They think he should have, somehow, dug his heals in to make … (View Post)2 -
Re: A potentially awkward start for the new Tory leader – politicalbetting.com
To be honest I am not sure that these “investment summit” type events are anything other than a bit of a press jamboree and a posh dinner. Much of the announcements are either reheats or things that … (View Post)3 -
Re: Oh James Cleverly – politicalbetting.com
Good rant - and agree with many of the points. But let’s be honest it’s not an exclusive thing for the Conservative Party to have a bit of crack at in-fighting. The Labour Party spent a good part of … (View Post)1